SoundCloud denies using artist tracks for AI training amid backlash, promising transparency and future opt-out options for creators.
SoundCloud denies AI training on artist content
— a claim that has sparked intense debate across the music industry. The controversy began after Futurism reported that SoundCloud had quietly updated its Terms and Conditions to potentially allow the use of artist tracks for AI training. This update, added sometime last year, included the clause: “You explicitly agree that your Content may be used to inform, train, develop or serve as input to artificial intelligence or machine intelligence technologies or services as part of and for providing the services.”
The report triggered immediate backlash, with many creators voicing concerns over potential misuse of their work. For a platform built on supporting emerging talent, this news struck a nerve, raising fears about the impact of AI on artistic integrity and creative control.
Official Response: Denial and Future Plans
In response, SoundCloud quickly released a statement on May 9, 2025, firmly denying the claims. The company stated, “SoundCloud has never used artist content to train AI models, nor do we develop AI tools or allow third parties to scrape or use SoundCloud content from our platform for AI training purposes.”
To further address the concerns, SoundCloud highlighted several technical safeguards designed to protect creator content. These include a “no AI” tag that explicitly prohibits unauthorized data scraping. This move aims to provide transparency and control to artists, a critical issue as the AI in music debate intensifies.
Possible Future Scenarios
However, SoundCloud’s response leaves the door open for potential AI integration down the line. In a statement to The Verge, the company admitted that it may consider using artist tracks for AI training in the future but promised robust internal permission controls. They assured creators that if this direction is taken, they will introduce clear opt-out mechanisms at a minimum.
Uploads from major labels would be exempt from such AI training if it ever occurs, while independent artists would have the option to decline participation.
Balancing Innovation and Artist Rights
SoundCloud’s swift response reflects the challenges faced by music platforms as they navigate the rapidly evolving AI landscape. While the company’s denial of current AI training might reassure some, the possibility of future integration raises ongoing questions about transparency, consent, and the role of AI in music creation.
As the industry shifts towards more AI-driven tools and algorithms, platforms like SoundCloud must balance innovation with the rights of creators. This delicate balance will likely shape the future of digital music for years to come.
Comments are closed.